Here are some good places to look: You never know when you'll get lucky. Hi, No, of course I'm not annoyed but I do think you are misinterpreting my "counter-implication. Condoms are clearly effective in decreasing the odds of being infected, but, clearly they are not absolutely effective.
These findings demonstrated that use of latex condoms can significantly reduce the risk of HIV transmission, but it does not eliminate that risk. But far too often with age the broadness of the mind and narrowness of the waist change places. Some people have said that ancient Egyptians wore condoms in different colors. The scary part of it was that the hole was on either side of the wrapper, which means that there probably were two holes in the condom.
I'll repost below a few questions from the archives that address the condom-efficacy question. I want to know if I am misunderstanding you, or what your opinion is on this otherwise. The Catholic Church is shamefully wrong in their condemnation of condoms. Assuming the leakage occurred through the only pore in each condom, the pore diameters ranged from 2 to 7 mcm. Assess Your Risk for HIV. Didn't get the message? So, why the confusion???